Hello Ian,

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 08:18:16PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Bug#817951: Simple helpers for handling orig tarballs 
> for packages where upstream's git is the canonical source"):
> > Could you give me some indication of what these other utilities will do?
> 
> Something to turn a branch which is a mixture of pseudomerges,
> upstream or mixed linear commits, and Debian linear commits, into
> something you could sensibly do `git rebase' on.  That would be part
> of a rebasey dgit workflow, but might be useful for other purposes.
> (#720177; doesn't need to be a dgit verb and maybe shouldn't be.)

Something like this should probably not be in devscripts, so I now
understand why you want to namespace.

> Something to conveniently import a tarball as a git commit (or
> optionally, just a tree).

gbp-import-orig does a pretty good job of this.  Maybe you just add a
wrapper, passing some sensible flags, so that it can be used without
d/gbp.conf, and without any ~/gbp.conf interfering?

> Utility to help do repeated merge for a downstream distro using
> --quilt=smash.

Similarly, not suitable for devscripts.

> > Depending on how dgit-specific they are, we could try to get some of
> > these into devscripts.
> 
> Perhaps, yes.  Maybe your proposed script wants to be in devscripts.
> devscripts is already rather namespace-abusive, so maybe if it's there
> we don't care much...

One thing that some scripts in devscripts do is prefix 'deb'.

You could use debgit- as a prefix for these dgit scripts?

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to