Am 29.08.2016 um 14:56 schrieb Christian Marillat: > You are really sure ?
All the patch seems to do in essence is use a different static timestamp value, which for all intents and purposes is fine, it just looks redundant.
Am 29.08.2016 um 14:56 schrieb Christian Marillat: > You are really sure ?
All the patch seems to do in essence is use a different static timestamp value, which for all intents and purposes is fine, it just looks redundant.