On 26 août 2016 15:09, Florian Höch <f...@hoech.net> wrote: > I'm a bit befuddled by this: > > Since DisplayCAL 3.1.5, the 'lastmod_time' variable is populated from > the value recorded statically in the file DisplayCAL/__version__.py that > is part of the source archive, so the build is (and was) reproducible > already [1], and the patch was unneeded. I see that the current build of > DisplayCAL 3.1.6 is not reproducible in Debian testing, and the reason > for this appears to be that the build does not use the pristine sources > (probably the unneeded patch is being applied?). > > So TLDR: Use the unmodified sources and all will be well.
You are really sure ? Christian
