On 08/25/2016 10:00 AM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> You are right. I raced off to install it again, and indeed the jre is > not installed. > > Thanks for letting me know. Is there any reason it has to depend on > default-jdk-doc at all? As in, what's wrong with openjdk-8-doc, or just > liblog4j2-java-doc by itself? (no biggie...) Many *-java-doc packages recommend or depend on default-jdk-doc because the documentation of the library contains links to the documentation of the core Java classes. > Apologies for the noise. Thanks for your patience :) No need to apology, we are glad to get feedback on our work :) Emmanuel Bourg
