control: owner -1 x...@debian.org Hi Dimitri!
>lowNMU is not meant for hostile takeovers of the package, ok?! =) sure, this is why only one NMU was done on your package :) >And I have accepted some patches from you, not all, and I did respond >to you about that. > >The urgency about the updates and fixes, for the issues that you >yourself raise, are a bit self-inflicted. Maybe I am wrong, but >certainly, there isn't an immediate needs to NMU this package. the copyright issues seems to be a policy violation, and this is what I'm mostly concerned about (I asked to make them RC, but you are of course free to disagree/downgrade) >Patches relevant for btrfs have been pulled into 4.7rc6 and once 4.7 >is updated into experimental or unstable, I can look into updating the >package with some of the changes that you are proposing. thanks for that, I'm setting you as owner for this bug :) >I have just finished a big update to mdadm, and I am at Debconf at the >moment. And I am still maintaining btrfs-progs. thanks, I hope you will consider his work, I like it ;) I'm leaving you the copyright answers then! G.
