* Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org>, 2016-07-06, 10:27:
As per Developer's Reference ยง5.11.1 this should have been uploaded to
DELAYED/10 at least.
Also, the NMU diff should be sent to BTS before the package is uploaded.
In general you are right, but in this case upstream and Debian
maintainers seems to be the same people, and they acked the other NMUs
in a matter of minutes.
https://github.com/Yubico/libu2f-host-dpkg/issues/2
they were aware of the ongoing NMU since 9 days, and this is the 3th
NMU that goes in unstable.
No, ACKing a NMU is not a blanket permission to do further further NMUs.
And if the maintainers were actually happy with any NMUs whatsoever,
then they could put the package on the lowNMU list, or orphan the
package. (The latter would be more honest IMO.)
--
Jakub Wilk
