Hi, JFTR, I have no need for this feature any more, and nothing to comment here. Do as you think is best.
Joachim Am 30. Juni 2016 16:39:23 MESZ, schrieb Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org>: >Control: tags -1 moreinfo > >Hi Joachim, > >Sorry that it took so long to get back to this issue. I took over >dbconfig-common a while ago and are now at the stage where I can >comment >on this request. > >On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:50:45 +0000 Joachim Breitner ><nome...@debian.org> >wrote: >> it would be nice if this scenario were supported: >> >> Two package, one a frontend and one a real dbconfig package, should >be >> able to share the configuration by setting the same package name in >the >> calls to dbc_go. > >Close. What if you leave the package name as they really are, but >provide the same dbname and dbuser in the config file of you >(hypothetical) package? > >> Currently it seems to fail when the frontend package is purged, >> confusing the other package. > >Yes, that is because the package name is the same, while that is not >really true. It probably fails on the debconf templates being removed. > >> Note that I do not have that setup any more with my packages, so I >donât >> have a developing test case. But itâs still a nice to have item :-) > >So I think this bug can be closed as already supported. Would be great >if somebody could check this (maybe I need a example package in this >area). > >Paul
