Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Joachim,
Sorry that it took so long to get back to this issue. I took over dbconfig-common a while ago and are now at the stage where I can comment on this request. On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:50:45 +0000 Joachim Breitner <nome...@debian.org> wrote: > it would be nice if this scenario were supported: > > Two package, one a frontend and one a real dbconfig package, should be > able to share the configuration by setting the same package name in the > calls to dbc_go. Close. What if you leave the package name as they really are, but provide the same dbname and dbuser in the config file of you (hypothetical) package? > Currently it seems to fail when the frontend package is purged, > confusing the other package. Yes, that is because the package name is the same, while that is not really true. It probably fails on the debconf templates being removed. > Note that I do not have that setup any more with my packages, so I donât > have a developing test case. But itâs still a nice to have item :-) So I think this bug can be closed as already supported. Would be great if somebody could check this (maybe I need a example package in this area). Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
