Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 11:59:30 +0200, wrote: > On 2016-06-04 11:37, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 11:04:03 +0200, wrote: > > > That said I don't know what we can do from the glibc side point of view > > > to change this behavior. > > > > We could keep a dumb empty lib6-i686 package for the Stretch release? > > Wouldn't that just postpone the problem to Stretch? When we really > remove the dummy package, apt and aptitude will still not show it as > virtual.
No, but the description of the package will be that it's a dumb package which can safely removed, not "the standard libraries that are used by nearly all programs on the system" :) Samuel
