Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 11:04:03 +0200, wrote: > That said I don't know what we can do from the glibc side point of view > to change this behavior.
We could keep a dumb empty lib6-i686 package for the Stretch release? Samuel
Aurelien Jarno, on Sat 04 Jun 2016 11:04:03 +0200, wrote: > That said I don't know what we can do from the glibc side point of view > to change this behavior.
We could keep a dumb empty lib6-i686 package for the Stretch release? Samuel