Hi, sorry and thanks for pointing me to my fault!

I did check git, found some issues committed but never uploaded, and I probably 
forgot about it
(well, I didn't forget, but after cloning the repo, and copy-pasting the 
changes... the deletion was 

overridden).

thanks a lot!

Gianfranco (who just uploaded a new version)





Il Domenica 10 Aprile 2016 0:16, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> ha scritto:
Control: reopen -1
Control: tags -1 - pending


On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 20:18:13 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: tags -1 pending patch

> >I don't think this was the right fix, because this kind of Recommends
> >is wrong in two accounts. First the module using this shared library is
> >shipped in the libslang2-modules, so the dependency is useless here. And
> >second, hardcoding the shared library name means each time the SONAME
> >changes this package has to be patched manually (making transitions
> >harder as binNMUs do not work here), when dpkg-shlibdeps has all the
> >required information to infer the correct dependency by using
> >-dRecommends for example.

> I agree with you, unfortunately I lack of time to give to each package
> for this transition, and the NMU was enough, even if delaying the issue
> to the next transition :)
> 
> thanks for checking, I should have spent a minute more and avoided this
> NMU, but I was trying to be safe, instead of being sorry :)
> >Please use the attached patch to properly fix this so that we don't
> >need to touch this on the next transition! :)

> Not providing a libpng16-dev library, but only a libpng-dev one, will
> probably avoid the ~100 NMU we had to do for this one :D

Unfortunately it seems the patch didn't get applied afterall?

,---
$ dpkg -s libslang2 | egrep '(Version|Recommends)'
Version: 2.3.0-2.2
Recommends: libpng16-16
`---

Thanks,
Guillem

Reply via email to