* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-03 20:02]: > * Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-19 02:14]: > > partman doesn't recognize ext2 revision 0 as ext2r0 but shows it as > > ext2. Ideally, what it should do is this: if it finds an ext2 file > > system, it should run "tune2fs -l" over the partition. > > Is the patch below acceptable? > > Comments: > - I'm not if testing for a file belonging to partman-ext2r0 is the > best way to check if it is available. Maybe valid_filesystems/ext2r0 > should be called? But I don't know.
Anton, do you have a more elegant way or is it okay to apply the patch I proposed? > Index: partman-base/update.d/detected_filesystem > =================================================================== > --- partman-base/update.d/detected_filesystem (revision 31824) > +++ partman-base/update.d/detected_filesystem (working copy) > @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ > rm -f $id/detected_filesystem > else > [ -d $id ] || mkdir $id > + if [ "$filesystem" = "ext2" -a -f /lib/partman/parted_names/ext2r0 ]; > then > + if $(tune2fs -l $path | grep -q "^Filesystem revision #: \+0 > (original)$"); then > + filesystem=ext2r0 > + fi > + fi > echo "$filesystem" >$id/detected_filesystem > fi > fi -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
