Hallo, * Mattia Rizzolo [Sun, Jan 10 2016, 11:49:34AM]: > Hi Eduard, and thanks for reaching out. > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:17:38PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > $ pbuilder build --basetgz /var/cache/pbuilder/base-amd64-jessie.tgz > > --distribution jessie apt-cacher-ng_0.8.8-1~bpo8+1_amd64.changes > > well, you don't pass the .changes to pbuilder, but the .dsc. I have a > feeling 'net' is the section of apt-cacher-ng. though I'm not sure why > it picks it up. > I should probably make pbuilder fail better if somebody pass t t t t > t it. > > > W: The following options specified after the .dsc will be ignored: [] > > btw, just FYI this last warning is a separate regression, but it's > totally harmless (e.g. it shouldn't be print if there is nothing, as in > this case).
Well, this mistake is probably totally obvious once you remembered how to use it or RTFMed again. But I was studying the output and none of the messages really yelled "you failed to provide a valid source". At least not anything I would interpret in a such way. And since it apparently started to do its job, there was no reason to assume that the parameters were wrong. So I started looking for other problems. Please display the reason for not doing any work in simple English. Regards, Eduard.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
