Am 08.01.2016 um 16:31 schrieb James Cowgill: > On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 16:20 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >> Am 08.01.2016 um 16:02 schrieb James Cowgill: >>> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 12:21 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: >>>> The package cannot be built with libpng16-dev because it >>>> conflicts with libpng12-dev. I will try to verify this patch as >>>> soon as this issue is resolved. >>> >>> This is intentional. Both packages provide files such as >>> /usr/include/png.h and libpng.so so they have to conflict with each >>> other. >>> >>> You have to remove libpng12-dev first or build the package in a >>> chroot. >> >> Hi, >> >> I just have replaced the current B-D on libpng-dev with libpng16-dev >> and I only build in clean chroots. My guess is that another build- >> dependency pulls in libpng12-dev and that leads to the aforementioned >> conflict. If I'm not mistaken I have to wait until the other package >> is fixed and then I can fix this issue. Right? > > Ah ok, I think this is because libpng16-dev doesn't provide libpng-dev > so any *-dev package depending on libpng-dev will use libpng12-dev. > > This is the package Tobias Frost posted which has libpng-dev enabled: > https://libpng.sviech.de/libpng_package_used/libpng1.6_1.6.19-1.dsc > > This thread has the link (+ some discussion): > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/01/msg00159.html
Meh, why isn't this package in experimental yet :/. I'll give it a try. Thanks, Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
