On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 16:20 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > Am 08.01.2016 um 16:02 schrieb James Cowgill: > > On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 12:21 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote: > > > The package cannot be built with libpng16-dev because it > > > conflicts with libpng12-dev. I will try to verify this patch as > > > soon as this issue is resolved. > > > > This is intentional. Both packages provide files such as > > /usr/include/png.h and libpng.so so they have to conflict with each > > other. > > > > You have to remove libpng12-dev first or build the package in a > > chroot. > > Hi, > > I just have replaced the current B-D on libpng-dev with libpng16-dev > and I only build in clean chroots. My guess is that another build- > dependency pulls in libpng12-dev and that leads to the aforementioned > conflict. If I'm not mistaken I have to wait until the other package > is fixed and then I can fix this issue. Right?
Ah ok, I think this is because libpng16-dev doesn't provide libpng-dev so any *-dev package depending on libpng-dev will use libpng12-dev. This is the package Tobias Frost posted which has libpng-dev enabled: https://libpng.sviech.de/libpng_package_used/libpng1.6_1.6.19-1.dsc This thread has the link (+ some discussion): https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2016/01/msg00159.html James
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
