On 26 Dec 2015 04:55, "martin f krafft" <madd...@debian.org> wrote: > > also sprach Jörg Frings-Fürst <deb...@jff-webhosting.net> [2015-12-26 11:48 +1300]: > > Care to elaborate why? > > Sorry, it's not terribly useful to augment the original bug report > that I first cloned. > > Basically, /usr/lib/modules-load.d is not supported by upstream, and > eventually we want to converge with upstream. For this to happen, > packages will need to stop using /usr/lib/modules-load.d and as > there is no real problem with using /lib/modules-load.d, I filed > this bug report.
I'm sorry if I gave you this impression, but this is not the case. The canonical upstream path is indeed /usr. However, because in debian we use split-usr, the path is moved to /. Because the /usr path is not documented when using split-usr, users will become confused (as you did) when a module is loaded and they can't find who instructed that module to load.
