Hi Steve,

> > Steve, can we now put this back on "needs to be fixed for stable" as
> > 0.30.209-1 is in ETCH anyway?
> 
> Not per Micah's comment that 0.30.209 is not ported to hppa yet.

well, but util-vserver 0.30.209-1 *IS* building just fine on hppa and is
working on hppa according to upstream. The support may not be largely
tested, but we're just on that. The patch is as simple as:
-(snip)-
--- util-vserver-0.30.209/debian/rules  2006-01-06 19:02:11.000000000 +0000
+++ util-vserver-0.30.209.hppa/debian/rules     2006-01-06 14:44:22.000000000 
+0000
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
 ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH),hppa)
     # dietlibc fails to define O_NOFOLLOW and O_LARGEFILE. These values
     # have been copied from glibc's bits/fcntl.h.
-#    CFLAGS += -DO_NOFOLLOW=00000200 -DO_LARGEFILE=00004000
-    do_not_buid_this_arch
+    # CFLAGS += -DO_NOFOLLOW=00000200 -DO_LARGEFILE=00004000
+    #do_not_buid_this_arch
 endif
 
 ifneq (,$(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
-(snip)-

-- 
Best regards,
 Kilian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply via email to