I will anyway upload newrelease with available fixes in the meanwhile Olivier
Le jeu. 10 déc. 2015 16:32, Aaron M. Ucko <a...@alum.mit.edu> a écrit : > Source: ncbi-blast+ > Version: 2.2.30-4+b1 > > Thanks, Olivier! > > FWIW, #793263 was fixed by a binNMU (so I'm belatedly marking it as > done), and #798277, while a very reasonable suggestion, doesn't affect > users, just allows for quicker builds. > > Meanwhile, I forgot I'd meant to see if there's another workaround for > #792510. I'm fairly busy too, but will try to find time to look into it. > > -- Aaron > > olivier sallou <olivier.sal...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi > > Sorry but i had little time to look due to job load... I will have a look > > very soon, promised :-) > > > > Olivier > > > > Le jeu. 10 déc. 2015 08:14, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> a écrit : > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I wonder what the status of ncbi-blast+ might be. There is a new > >> upstream version (2.2.31) for some time. It has also some longer > >> standing open bugs where #798277 has a very simple patch and as far as I > >> can see #793263 simply needs a simple rebuild of the package. > >> > >> Since I never dealt with this package and it was always maintained > >> pretty much in time I wonder whether I should touch it or whether > >> somebody of the former Uploaders (Aaron, Olivier) like to harvest these > >> low hanging fruits for our advent calendar bug squashing party. > >> > >> Just let me know if you need some help > >> > >> Andreas. > >> > >> -- > >> http://fam-tille.de >
