-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 reassign 798855 openjdk-7-jre 7u85-2.6.1-5 thanks
Dear OpenJDK maintainers, It seems that #508650 (empty windows for non-reparenting window managers) has resurfaced, the issue can be reproduced using josm and its 'Download from OSM' menu option under awesome. The fix for #508650 was the introduction of the _JAVA_AWT_WM_NONREPARENTING environment variable and related handling in openjdk-6, these changes may have been lost in openjdk-7 and later. Is such a change possible in openjdk-7, or at least openjdk-8 which should become default in the not to distant future? On 10-10-15 19:07, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 10-10-15 18:58, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-10-10 15:58:42) >>> On 14-09-15 00:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> On 14-09-15 00:07, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>>>> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-09-14 00:00:23) >>>>>> A possible difference - if you tested with both those DEs >>>>>> installed - might be some package dependency missing >>>>>> from josm or a java library which gets pulled in by >>>>>> larger DEs and therefore often unnoticed. I use Awesome >>>>>> and mostly GTK-based applications, avoiding both KDE and >>>>>> GNOME as much as I can. I do generally respect >>>>>> recommends, however - attached is the list of unsatisfied >>>>>> reverse recommends (too long, as some are satisfied by >>>>>> alternative packages). >>>> >>>> Awesome doesn't appear to be a good choice of DE. I can >>>> reproduce the problem with josm under awesome. This issue >>>> should probably be reassigned to awesome, this isn't an >>>> issue with josm. >>> >>> I've tested this issue with the new JOSM 8800 from >>> experimental, which still has this issue. >>> >>> Interestingly the 'Download from OSM' window does work, new >>> tiles get downloaded when zooming with the scroll wheel and >>> hitting enter downloads the area in question, it just doesn't >>> get rendered. >>> >>> Jonas, do you think it's worthwhile to reassign this issue to >>> awesome? > >> Is it perhaps related to bug#508650? If so (or similar) I find >> it wrong to file it against each specific window managers - >> perhaps reassing to openjdk instead? > > #508650 surely sounds exactly like this issue, so reassigning to > openjdk may be more appropriate indeed. - -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWInwEAAoJEGdQ8QrojUrx5hwP/3HpeTtSl+GNUPGbTIqAsE5b 1YGd/+z6GjcJDUIEIen//k/hJGH8ZEoKK587dmcZFFYA27BT0I1ln3XxGJs79oDo fURAqcgrBD4lOWgoV4yNrEu+NLfr11FJwPiF7xZdviui9oML+997NFXUBa1V0HVs AgiMClvpKny1z6vw3okyF1y53kTWeQDJ3y2JC7NdFI5V6g0SiJkCf2hOHV9Jwz3a WYkUAaXmVoGbhHn/nydscj4B1OV1ZByeVJoEl3AVcgbeBXjEJlYUXzX4dOX8y2UP ggSY8WtFFe2MSDitLQbW9I9VgcLwszwPaJgdkrLKLWDUVbK8lkFIqH/8MPgOoBIS h1Xg6G7dB63jUOrbCMHQS9QJ4YhjJPEOpIvVi3td4wWetgWQbV3NpJiXkdZuZq/c 5uzRPCHXb0RZDxq3Wj1mfvkX+atyBkFBdRUcGIkBZv8mt2u57ZMGfAuwklemKcQs NDmD2rwS4dkcZv+2mpSoEPanXVB8fNR2dDVzpBpJ+mzS4Zwew82muEiUerYLpMRS /NA6ZPO3iYzcqu8L3JmPkk1J7ZYbJ2saB5cyJSDbE7bkLEM/Q/wHrbjkz1NpVppy SOrqlpji8QAAAYR8BbTFsI18mvtnZJeJfpIlQphWXeLab6JITZuSawFuVISJZtIS pqSqQU1z5fpAiRmIZUfa =OSGi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
