Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-10-10 15:58:42) > On 14-09-15 00:23, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 14-09-15 00:07, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-09-14 00:00:23) >>>> Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-09-13 22:09:11) >>>>> Your debug output doesn't show anything out of the ordinary. >>>>> So I still have no clue what's different on your system to >>>>> break josm. Maybe a GPU driver issue that fumbles drawing the >>>>> new windows. >>>> >>>> My machine is a Lenovo Edge 145 laptop with AMD Radeon HD 8240 >>>> GPU using the free driver. >>>> >>>> A possible difference - if you tested with both those DEs >>>> installed - might be some package dependency missing from josm >>>> or a java library which gets pulled in by larger DEs and >>>> therefore often unnoticed. I use Awesome and mostly GTK-based >>>> applications, avoiding both KDE and GNOME as much as I can. I >>>> do generally respect recommends, however - attached is the list >>>> of unsatisfied reverse recommends (too long, as some are >>>> satisfied by alternative packages). >> >> Awesome doesn't appear to be a good choice of DE. I can reproduce >> the problem with josm under awesome. This issue should probably be >> reassigned to awesome, this isn't an issue with josm. > > I've tested this issue with the new JOSM 8800 from experimental, which > still has this issue. > > Interestingly the 'Download from OSM' window does work, new tiles get > downloaded when zooming with the scroll wheel and hitting enter > downloads the area in question, it just doesn't get rendered. > > Jonas, do you think it's worthwhile to reassign this issue to awesome?
Is it perhaps related to bug#508650? If so (or similar) I find it wrong to file it against each specific window managers - perhaps reassing to openjdk instead? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
