On 22/09/15 13:15, Craig Small wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 08:04:54PM +0100, OmegaPhil wrote:
>> kb_main_cached = kb_page_cache + kb_slab;
>>
>> This is wrong as kb_slab includes SUnreclaim - presumably this should be
>> kb_slab_reclaimable?
> Thanks for looking into this, my initial thought is that what you have
> described here and on the conky issue looks right. I have forwarded the
> report to the procps list as I wasn't the one that introduced this
> change and so there might be a reason for it.
> 
> The change was done in 3.3.10 to fix a problem, I suspect it fixed that
> and introduced another. Linux memory reporting is fiddly to say the
> least.
> 
>  - Craig


Thanks, I've subscribed to that list. Sorry I thought you were also the
upstream maintainer since I noticed procps-ng
(https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/).




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to