On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 08:04:54PM +0100, OmegaPhil wrote: > kb_main_cached = kb_page_cache + kb_slab; > > This is wrong as kb_slab includes SUnreclaim - presumably this should be > kb_slab_reclaimable? Thanks for looking into this, my initial thought is that what you have described here and on the conky issue looks right. I have forwarded the report to the procps list as I wasn't the one that introduced this change and so there might be a reason for it.
The change was done in 3.3.10 to fix a problem, I suspect it fixed that and introduced another. Linux memory reporting is fiddly to say the least. - Craig -- Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
