On 01:44 Fri 30 Dec 2005, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > >>>>> "David" == David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > David> I'm not quite sure about this, since I don't use epiphany > David> that much to be able, on a proper way, to maintain an extra > David> binary package. Are you willing to co-maintain and take care > David> of this extra binary and any relationship the package itself > David> could have directly with gwget? > > Hello, > > I usually use Epiphany, so i could be interested by maintaining this > package. Could you add me as a co-maintainer to this package, i will > work on epiphany-extension-gwget package. It needs minor changes but i > would like to know what you think about my patch, is it clean (i usually > make my package using cdbs) ?
My concept of clean vanishes when I see productivity first, so, don't worry about cleanness by now, let's just get this to work. Anyway, a couple of questions, how did you get to this name for the extension? Is it worthwhile to package it since there are no other "independent" extensions around on the archive? I don't think your package would be policy-compliant, since you are moving versioned contents to the package. Could you please, at first, create the package to see how is its behaviour? Cheers, -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: C671257D Come to where the flavor is. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
