On 00:19 Sun 01 Jan 2006, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: > >>>>> "David" == David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > David> Anyway, a couple of questions, how did you get to this name > David> for the extension? Is it worthwhile to package it since there > David> are no other "independent" extensions around on the archive? > David> I don't think your package would be policy-compliant, since > David> you are moving versioned contents to the package. Could you > David> please, at first, create the package to see how is its > David> behaviour? > > Hello, > > Actually, i got this name from the package epiphany-extensions. In > addition, this package is build for a particular version of epiphany and > doesn't specify it. So should i specify the epiphany version in the > package name ?
Of course, being build dependency or even runtime dependency. > Following your request, i have put the package somewhere : > http://velma.mini-dweeb.org/~arnau/deb/epiphany-extension-gwget_0.96-2_i386.deb Are you unfamiliar with packaging system? What I'd need are source files: dsc, orig.tar.gz and diff.gz. > I hope it will help. Happy new year ! :) It will help, thanks. Happy 2006 for you too. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: C671257D Ahà vienen esos pinches nacos otra vez.
