On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 03:11:33AM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > On Friday 04 September 2015 12:50:34 Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > Source should be golang-github-influxdb-influxdb. > > I agree that policy regarding naming of -dev packages is important but I also > > believe that there is no reason to rename source package. It is unnecessary > and I'd much like to keep it as "influxdb" -- if this is against the policy > than I suggest to amend policy to avoid enforcing name of the source package.
I said "should" not "must" -- I was just putting that in the mail in
case someone in the future found it looking for how to name a package.
influxdb makes sense, since it builds a binary called that.
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
