-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Tomasz,

On 08/23/15 14:56, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> 
> Hi Harri, as I wrote above - I don't want to endorse software packages 
> outside Debian and doing what you proposed looks like that to me.

Usually I would agree, but in this case its upstream providing a
Debian package. Can we ignore Debian packages provided by upstream?

> What about Recommends?
> 

"Recommends" sounds like something optional. I would guess that
debocker doesn't work without either docker.io or lxc-docker, does
it?

Using "Depends: docker.io | lxc-docker" docker.io is included by
default, not to mention that there is no lxc-docker in the default
Debian repositories.

I am not sure at all why there are 2 docker packages. Did lxc-docker
violate some Debian policies? Maybe the maintainers of docker.io and
lxc-docker could agree upon a common virtual package name?


Regards
Harri

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJV3zjgAAoJEAqeKp5m04HLqVMH/09+hdQBaZeRnlC/UugSvrQ5
4mdMkXoT/njAnHzPeo/TSnqpW6H/2Z/M5JwvWKFa7joBys5KTLLElSwdJDI8e7qx
zSU+flPIF824NMSMz8MoYbd/C2b4zaIGTpFyassh+FAuv+uHX3GnRsAsQT5hvJwK
Pv021Ba0yGSMzsVP6kNvfyan0+IogfkjjN1ph1VcIJVl6rcASlB5+9SnyvBmxB4t
Yvw2nQvFtJbhCDvF9GiFbBBL8EBC/fPtZG9yA7lsQ8W0KooJEXhgUSSIU+pYMZV7
2EyC0BCebb0CZ69FvV3/i1v4V32NbrGwg6edRs3eGV4EtY0WY2pz3TBaOhQRJXE=
=S823
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to