On 22.08.2015 15:12, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Am Samstag, den 22.08.2015, 14:38 +0200 schrieb Andreas Cadhalpun: >> I don't see a point in doing this, when such mixtures just work. > > To preserve relevance of our bug reports.
Maybe you have a point there, but I don't think it will change much in that respect. > What e.g. if dmo's packages introduce a bug that our version doesn't have? Such a bug report would just get closed, which is probably less maintenance burden than adapting the dependencies. We can discuss this again, once such a bug has been filed. (Currently, that's not possible, because the package names are different.) Best regards, Andreas
