On 19/08/15 21:25, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 19/08/15 20:06, OmegaPhil wrote:
>>
>> Since I've noticed the gtk2 package is marked deprecated (itself a bad
>> thing - how can I reduce the height of the retardedly large GTK3 tab
>> bar?), I've attempted to switch over to the main package - however none
>> of my scripts to start up a window with more than one tab ('session')
>> work anymore. Investigating, it appears that the --tab command now
>> blocks:
>>
>> ====================================================================
>>
>> roxterm --tab -n "Bash 2 - %s" && roxterm --tab -n "Editing 1 - %s"
> 
> The first instance should always have blocked anyway, unless you use the
> --fork option. Use --fork instead of & in the shell, because it's
> supposed to wait until the first instance is ready to handle further
> commands. That didn't always work, but I've changed something in 3.1
> which hopefully fixes it.
> 
> The gtk2 version wouldn't have been possible to keep in Debian because
> the old vte packages are being removed in the next release. The gtk3
> version of vte has made some useful new features possible too.


Understood, so basically I was testing the completely wrong thing.

The real problem that got my attention was this:

With no roxterm instances running:

======================================================================

roxterm --replace tab -n "Bash 2 - %s" && roxterm --tab -n "Editing 1 - %s"

======================================================================

This blocks and results in a stable terminal, close and the remaining
terminal appears and stays around as expected.

======================================================================

roxterm --fork --replace tab -n "Bash 2 - %s" && roxterm --tab -n
"Editing 1 - %s"

======================================================================

The terminal window quickly appears and disappears. I can see the Bash 2
tab is being made, but I can't quite make out if the Editing 1 tab is.
Nothing is output on stdout/err.

Does that happen for you?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to