On 30/07/15 10:24, Christoph Groth wrote: > Dererk wrote: > >> This is due to repacking applied at source tarball for DFSG-compliance, >> since some minifications (mainly distributed as .min.*) are currently >> considered non-dfsg-compliant on the Debian project. >> Please see debian/README.source. > > But surely making a package DFSG compliant shouldn’t cause it to fail > silently in some cases. If a Nikola theme cannot be provided > completely because parts of it are not DFSG compliant, IMHO that theme > should be removed completely. > > Christoph Hi Christoph!
The answer to the question is no related to the issue submitted to the BTS. I was merely explaining why you see less files at tarballs than the original at upstream archive. The proper solution in Debian has been workarounded by depending on a third-party (libjs-bootstrap, etc) and linking the missing objects to it. A fix to the reported issue has been uploaded a few hours ago. Cheers, Dererk -- BOFH excuse #188: ..disk or the processor is on fire.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
