On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:36:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Why didn't you prevent bash 3.1-1 entering to testing if you knew > about this fucking regression? I really think bash 3.0 should be in > testing until a fix for this bug is found. Why? It was rated a 'normal' severity bug by the submitter, and nobody changed it. I think this is the correct severity. Since it isn't RC, it doesn't prevent testing propogation. Is there some reason why this is highly important to you?
-- Clear skies, Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
