Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:36:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Why didn't you prevent bash 3.1-1 entering to testing if you knew > > about this fucking regression? I really think bash 3.0 should be in > > testing until a fix for this bug is found. > Why? It was rated a 'normal' severity bug by the submitter, and > nobody changed it. I think this is the correct severity. Since it > isn't RC, it doesn't prevent testing propagation. Is there some > reason why this is highly important to you?
It's a regression. I thing regressions should prevent packages from entering testing otherwise code can degrade if nobody fixes it. I had to downgrade to 3.0 because of this regression. Prueba el Nuevo Correo Terra; Seguro, Rápido, Fiable.
