On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 06:30:03PM +0200, Peter Bienstman wrote: > > > > But if that is ok, because the precise algorithm is not important for > > > > what you want to do with this data, then there is no reason not to fix > > the scheduler now. > > > > > > I agree. > > > > Excellent! I look forward to the update. > > Oops, I misread your mail as "there is no reason to fix the scheduler now" > :-) > > Anyway, I'd be happy to tweak the scheduler, but I'd like to back it up with > statistical data analysis first, especially since this behavior has been in > place for almost 10 years, and people are used to it.
People are also used to programs doing what it says in the documentation. If you aren't going to fix the scheduler, then at least mention this difference with SM2 in the docs. It is a pretty major deviation, and one sentence is easy to write. Or, better yet, you could create an option. Best regards, Astrid -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
