On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 17:38:12 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 17:25:22 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Control: severity -1 important > > Control: reopen -1 > > Control: retitle -1 dpkg-maintscript-helper: document required package > > qualification on arch:all <=> arch:any switches > > > On 2015-01-23 17:12, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > This needs to be passed the correct arch-qualified package name (either > > > :<arch> or :all) for the previous package. Thus closing. But feel free > > > to reopen if I missed something else. > > > > I think this should be documented ... > > I've already got locally a commit documenting the implicit > arch-qualification (I think prompted by one of your earlier bug > reports), but I can make it explicit that the package needs to be > explicitly arch qualified when switching arch too. > > Hmm, which makes me think, cross-grading will not be supported either > by those packages… I'll have to ponder about it.
Sorry, actually for non-M-A:same packages the best thing to do is to just pass the non-arch-qualified package name which will support all the above cases correctly. I'll try to make that clear in the man page. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org