On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 23:55:50 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:46:31 -0300 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday 19 October 2013 11:26:02 Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > In case you test this workaround, please let me know whether it works
> > > acceptably...
> > 
> > Excellent, this is indeed working :)
> 
> I am glad to hear that.
> Thanks for the feedback!
[...]

Hello Lisandro, I hope you are doing well.

I managed to implement support for Acquire::http::Proxy-Auto-Detect
into apt-listbugs.
I've just pushed the modifications to the public git repository:
they will be part of the next upload of the package (version 0.1.17).

I would be happy, if you could test these modifications and let me know
whether they work as expected. I only tested them with a fake auto
proxy detect command...
You may find the development version of apt-listbugs at the tip of the
master branch on the public git repository and rebuild the binary
package yourself, if you have time to do so. Otherwise, I can send you
a pre-built binary package to test, if you prefer.

I am assuming (hoping, actually!) that you are still using the network
setup described in the original bug report [1].
Also, please remember to disable the workaround that I suggested to
you [2], obviously...

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/726430#5
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/726430#53

I am looking forward to hearing back from you.
Bye and thanks for your time!



-- 
 http://www.inventati.org/frx/
 fsck is a four letter word...
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82  3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE

Attachment: pgpq2bZH2Jylu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to