On 9 January 2015 at 16:02, Carl Fürstenberg <azat...@gmail.com> wrote: > The frontend is called "obs-studio", though it contains a library called > libobs0, thus I felt calling the source package obs-studio a bit wrong. > At the moment, the binary packages would be obs-studio, obs-plugins, > libobs0, libobs-dev, and libobs0-dbg. >
These look like good binary package names. obs-studio sounds like a good source package name as well (it's mostly non-user visible anyway). Thanks! > But true, the source package though could be renamed to obsproject or > similar; I'll have to talk to upstream first what they recommend. > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org> > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> On 7 January 2015 at 01:57, Carl Fürstenberg <azat...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Package: wnpp >> > Severity: wishlist >> > Owner: "Carl Fürstenberg" <azat...@gmail.com> >> > >> > * Package name : obs >> > Version : 0.7.2 >> > Upstream Author : Hugh Bailey <obs....@gmail.com> >> > * URL : https://obsproject.com/ >> > * License : GPL >> > Programming Lang: C, C++ >> > Description : Open Broadcast Software >> > >> > a rewrite of what was formerly known as "Open Broadcaster Software", >> > software originally designed for recording and streaming live >> > video content, efficiently. >> > >> >> obs also means "open build service" and we have "obs-build" already >> packaged. ( a component of it) >> >> Would you mind using a more verbose name for source & binary packages? >> e.g. obsproject or open-broadcast? >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> Dimitri. > > > > > -- > Carl Fürstenberg -- Regards, Dimitri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
