The frontend is called "obs-studio", though it contains a library called libobs0, thus I felt calling the source package obs-studio a bit wrong. At the moment, the binary packages would be obs-studio, obs-plugins, libobs0, libobs-dev, and libobs0-dbg.
But true, the source package though could be renamed to obsproject or similar; I'll have to talk to upstream first what they recommend. On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov <x...@debian.org> wrote: > Hello, > > On 7 January 2015 at 01:57, Carl Fürstenberg <azat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: "Carl Fürstenberg" <azat...@gmail.com> > > > > * Package name : obs > > Version : 0.7.2 > > Upstream Author : Hugh Bailey <obs....@gmail.com> > > * URL : https://obsproject.com/ > > * License : GPL > > Programming Lang: C, C++ > > Description : Open Broadcast Software > > > > a rewrite of what was formerly known as "Open Broadcaster Software", > > software originally designed for recording and streaming live > > video content, efficiently. > > > > obs also means "open build service" and we have "obs-build" already > packaged. ( a component of it) > > Would you mind using a more verbose name for source & binary packages? > e.g. obsproject or open-broadcast? > > -- > Regards, > > Dimitri. > -- Carl Fürstenberg
