On 01/08/2015 09:06 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > Hi Thomas > > Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> writes: > >> Ooops, then that's the issue, neutron/configure_db should really be set >> to no. I'm retitling the bug, and will fix the issue. > > Thanks, that helps a lot for people that don't use debconf to configure > the openstack packages. There is still another issue that the db > migrations on upgrade should be run even if the database was not > configured with debconf. IMO these should either run in any case where a > database connection is configured or there should be a separate debconf > question (defaulting to true) for deciding of migrations should be run > or not. Running migrations on upgrade and configureing the database > throug debconf are two separate things. > > Gaudenz
Gaudenz, The Debian distribution is the only one which made the choice of doing all of the db sync things in an automated way. So I think it's fine to do it by hand if you decide to use the non-interactive mode. Plus I believe that a single on/off prompt for handling of the database bits of OpenStack core projects is more than enough, and adding some more would be a bad idea. Anyway, it is a way too late in the Debian cycle to introduce new debconf prompts. Even translation uploads are not accepted by the release team at this point. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
