-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 10/28/2014 05:19 PM, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 04:50:16PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: >> You appear to be using systemd so I believe the problem would be >> there. util-linux's fsck is only used with sysvinit. > > Thats not true. systemd-fsck is just a simple wrapper launching > util-linux fsck (which itself is also just a not-equally-but-almost-as > simple wrapper that figures out which filesystem-specific fsck to run).
I see, very strange. Even though it dropped the use of fsck -a, it does still use fsck, even though it does know the proper fs fsck tool's name and checks to make sure it exists. In that case, I'd bet that blkid -p run on that device will report that it is fat because it does in fact, still contain a fat boot sector. In that case, this bug can be closed and David just needs to remove the bogus fat boot sector with wipefs. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUUCq8AAoJEI5FoCIzSKrw7R0H/21sXMr0ulvx/hHk38c37D6I O0nNyF1Ynfc41rCCkKhw2/XCBOeY4Q4CVQJLJ/RO37iCVpuf8Rnl4DQzPY5LBE0R sICU52QkW6SsQff1nTJNF1nx5rzStchEyW4ZR0ny1dsqJXinomoioKmtHEt9vSI8 +U+BOwQEw1kdTaqyquccpWb2KRnR4LVOGffpTvLGRR7r4e9JqW62B9czdH87xFGO UMUTLcrJbEPnWfC0/ceWpV2uAxiwv91yI8ugKJfocNv9Z+Gvt7JfkVwJgCuaZM4/ cqmsxEK+f3vHY7RYjdEc+B0ayKrU/8sGP5Onc29PUCkvWv+Mi7fhPTmfnm6GPns= =7IsD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
