That would be for a wishlist bug. As it stands, nearly all packages that depend on aspell don't explicitly recommend any aspell dictionary.
Michael Forbes wrote: > > Upon reading the Debian package relationship policy I understand that > spelling should only be a recommended package for gaim. What is still > unclear to me however is what libaspell15 can do without apsell. Having > gaim require libaspell15 seems to do very little since libaspell15 alone > adds no spell checking ability. I realize that the dependency issue is > minor but I really think that gaim should at least inform the user that > if spell checking is enabled and aspell is missing that spell checking > will not work. Not everyone thoroughly examines all of the recommending > packages when they are installing their entire system (ie. > KDE+firefox+gaim+etc). > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
