On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Joey Hess wrote: > Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > yeap -- sounds like a good analysis/concerns, hinting once again to make > > it optional thus maintaining original "integrity" and solely allowing > > linked storage as user's choice -- for the throw-away clones (per my use > > case) above concerns unlikely be relevant.
> Another approach might be for git-annex init to check if the git > repository was cloned with --shared and if so, set annex.hardlink=1, and > also set the repository as untrusted. doh -- I didn't know about --shared (only about --local), and that is why I have rejected initial similar idea ;) So -- sounds cool and the way to go ;) -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D. http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Research Scientist, Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept. Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
