Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > yeap -- sounds like a good analysis/concerns, hinting once again to make > it optional thus maintaining original "integrity" and solely allowing > linked storage as user's choice -- for the throw-away clones (per my use > case) above concerns unlikely be relevant.
Another approach might be for git-annex init to check if the git repository was cloned with --shared and if so, set annex.hardlink=1, and also set the repository as untrusted. -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
