tag 322521 wontfix
thanks

On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:42:35PM +0100, Loic Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reopen 322521
> severity 322521 wishlist
> retitle 322521 Please provide firefox-dev and xulrunner packages
> thanks
> 
>         Hi,
> 
> On jeu, aoĆ» 11, 2005, Hidetaka Iwai wrote:
> > I maintain the debian package of kazehakase(gecko based web browser)
> > and kazehakase can use lib libgtkembedmoz.so of mozilla-firefox since
> > version 0.2.6.  
> 
>  (I maintain the Galeon packages and co-maintain the Yelp, Epiphany and
>  mozilla-bonobo packages.)
> 
> > I plan to use the firefox's gecko as the rendering engine of
> > kazehakase, so could you please provide libgtkembedmoz.so with
> > mozilla-firefox package, and a development package such as
> > mozilla-firefox-dev?
> 
>  So do I.  I am reopening this bug because I think it is of actuality
>  again.  Ubuntu is building Galeon against Firefox since months.  They
>  just decided they will build most things against Firefox:
>     
> <http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2005-November/000018.html>
> 
>  I don't want to start the "Ubuntu can do it, why can't Debian do it"
>  kind of discussion, but I'm sensible to:
>  - most active upstream projects such as Epiphany, Galeon, Yelp being
>    ready to switch to Firefox
>  - the availability of two upstream products serving the same purpose
>    (Mozilla and Firefox), with one being abandonned and one actively
>    developped
>  - the fact that this means we're maintaining two products in Debian (eg
>    wasting time)
>  - third party apps are forced to use the older product, Mozilla
>  - users are forced to install mozilla-browser, but really want to run
>    firefox
> 
>  Now Ubuntu certainly has control on their copy of the mozilla source
>  package, and this means there would have been two reasons for them
>  *not* to do such a switch:
>  - they could have tried to not diverge two much from Debian
>  - they could have fixed the mozilla source package
>  ... but Ubuntu choosed to switch to Firefox.
> 
>  I would be interested in knowing what's hold-up-ing the firefox
>  development packages, or xulrunner.

Time. But I'm not holding up things, if you want to help, you can ask me
for my current diff.gz.

And I'll repeat myself : there won't be a mozilla-firefox-dev package.

Mike


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to