On mar, nov 29, 2005, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote: > > > The reasons for this are still a mystery to me, could you explain some > > > of them? > > Read the bug log again ;) > I did it and all I see is the "no competition with mozilla-dev" argument. > For this, please note: There is no competition if there is no competitor. > Upstream is dead! Downstream is dead too (look at buglist for > mozilla).
Right, this is what I did read (prior to reopening the report) too. My mails to Kitame end in /dev/null, and his packages are more than borken. Why isn't it possible to have a /usr/lib/firefox and a firefox-dev package that would offer the same functionality for a transition period, and conflict with mozilla-dev? -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>