On mar, nov 29, 2005, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> > >  The reasons for this are still a mystery to me, could you explain some
> > >  of them?
> > Read the bug log again ;)
> I did it and all I see is the "no competition with mozilla-dev" argument.
> For this, please note: There is no competition if there is no competitor.
> Upstream is dead! Downstream is dead too (look at buglist for
> mozilla).

 Right, this is what I did read (prior to reopening the report) too.  My
 mails to Kitame end in /dev/null, and his packages are more than
 borken.  Why isn't it possible to have a /usr/lib/firefox and a
 firefox-dev package that would offer the same functionality for a
 transition period, and conflict with mozilla-dev?

-- 
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to