Hi! On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 23:19:45 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2014-08-11 22:05, Guillem Jover wrote: > > This is rather unwise, for no apparent reason. The -z9 seems to be a > > common pattern in most (if not all) of Daniel's packages, and I think > > should be reverted, if absent of a good rationale. > > Oh, I forgot that this is still present in wheezy's version. I already > removed it in unstable. > > >> Anyhoo, reassigning to dpkg in case the have seen something similar before. > > > > Reassigning back, this would need fixing in a stable release. > > I'm a bit confused - could you elaborate on what you mean by that?
Given that the -z9 setting makes the package unextractable on some systems (which from my PoV makes it an RC bug) and is Priority:standard, which means it will be pulled in on most systems, IMO it deserves to be fixed in the affected Debian release, which in this case is stable (wheezy). Hope that clarifies? > > But given that this is a Priority:standard package, I'd say it makes > > sense to do so. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
