Control: reassign -1 libkeyutils1
Control: found -1 1.5.5-3

Hi!

On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 21:30:06 +0200, Christian Kastner wrote:
> reassign 757740 dpkg
> thanks
> 
> On 2014-08-11 03:21, Antoni Villalonga wrote:
> > My fresh debian installation on a mips arch can't install 
> > libkeyutils1_1.5.5-3_mips.deb file.
> > 
> > # dpkg -i /tmp/libkeyutils1_1.5.5-3_mips.deb  
> > (Reading database ... 14103 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Preparing to replace libkeyutils1:mips 1.5.5-3 (using 
> > .../libkeyutils1_1.5.5-3_mips.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement libkeyutils1:mips ...
> > dpkg-deb (subprocess): decompressing archive member: lzma error: Cannot 
> > allocate memory
> 
> This isn't a bug -- your system simply appears to have run out of memory.

Well the packaging in that version does not help. See below.

> > dpkg-deb: error: subprocess <decompress> returned error exit status 2
> > dpkg: error processing /tmp/libkeyutils1_1.5.5-3_mips.deb (--install):
> >  subprocess dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile returned error exit status 2
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> >  /tmp/libkeyutils1_1.5.5-3_mips.deb
> > # md5sum /tmp/libkeyutils1_1.5.5-3_mips.deb
> > 1a7849c38607e11a85a4562492fd0e0a  /tmp/libkeyutils1_1.5.5-3_mips.deb
> > 
> > 
> > After that it works.
> > % dpkg-deb -R libkeyutils1_1.5.9-4_mips.deb libk 
> > % dpkg-deb -b libk
> > # dpkg -i libk.deb 
> > (Reading database ... 14103 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Preparing to replace libkeyutils1:mips 1.5.5-3 (using libk.deb) ...
> > Unpacking replacement libkeyutils1:mips ...
> > Setting up libkeyutils1:mips (1.5.5-3) ...
> 
> I'm surprised this works. If insufficient memory was available the first
> time round, one would assume the same the second time round... Did you
> omit any other steps in between the output listed above that might have
> freed memory? The OOM killer might have also freed some memory...

What he did was repack the .deb, which makes use of the default
settings instead of the ones supplied by the packaging, i.e.:

,---
override_dh_builddeb:
        dh_builddeb -- -Zxz -z9
`---

This is rather unwise, for no apparent reason. The -z9 seems to be a
common pattern in most (if not all) of Daniel's packages, and I think
should be reverted, if absent of a good rationale.

> Anyhoo, reassigning to dpkg in case the have seen something similar before.

Reassigning back, this would need fixing in a stable release. But given
that this is a Priority:standard package, I'd say it makes sense to do
so.

Thanks,
Guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to