2014-08-12 10:52 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Dröge <sl...@coaxion.net>: > On Di, 2014-08-12 at 10:46 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> 2014-08-12 10:29 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Dröge <sl...@coaxion.net>: >> > On Di, 2014-08-12 at 10:13 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> >> 2014-08-12 10:10 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Dröge <sl...@coaxion.net>: >> >> > On Di, 2014-08-12 at 09:26 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> >> >> Package: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg >> >> >> Version: 0.10.13-5 >> >> >> Followup-For: Bug #742037 >> >> >> >> >> >> Jessie will ship with Iceweasel (>= 30) which has Gstreamer 1.0 >> >> >> support. >> >> >> Thus, would a solution be to concentrate FFMPEG porting efforts on 1.0, >> >> >> rather than on 0.10 Gstreamer? Can we produce 1.0 modules with new AV? >> >> > >> >> > Yes, see the gstreamer1.0-libav package. >> >> >> >> Is there anything preventing us from building gstreamer1.0-ffmpeg >> >> packages then? >> > >> > You mean building gst-libav against ffmpeg instead of libav? No, unless >> > ffmpeg has a different API than libav v10 there should be no problem. >> >> Not quite what I meant. >> >> We currently have a Gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg that is stuck in Sid because >> it won't build against recent libav. Do we have something to produce a >> Gstreamer1.0-ffmpeg against current libav? There's hardly any software >> that explictly needs Gstreamer 0.10 left in Jessie, so we could pretty >> much let the whole Gstreamer 0.10 stack go, if that's the case. > > gstreamer1.0-libav is exactly what you mean then. It's just renamed from > -ffmpeg to -libav as upstream also switched to libav as default.
OK. Good to know. Is it a drop-in replacement for the older -ffmpeg? i.e. will Iceweasel be able to play H.264 media content with it? Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/debian-bugs-dist
