On Di, 2014-08-12 at 10:13 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > 2014-08-12 10:10 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Dröge <sl...@coaxion.net>: > > On Di, 2014-08-12 at 09:26 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >> Package: gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg > >> Version: 0.10.13-5 > >> Followup-For: Bug #742037 > >> > >> Jessie will ship with Iceweasel (>= 30) which has Gstreamer 1.0 support. > >> Thus, would a solution be to concentrate FFMPEG porting efforts on 1.0, > >> rather than on 0.10 Gstreamer? Can we produce 1.0 modules with new AV? > > > > Yes, see the gstreamer1.0-libav package. > > Is there anything preventing us from building gstreamer1.0-ffmpeg packages > then?
You mean building gst-libav against ffmpeg instead of libav? No, unless ffmpeg has a different API than libav v10 there should be no problem.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
