On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 03:34:13PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: [...] > maybe, but I was under the impression that a clean interface would not > address a specific object name, but tries to find a counterpart via a > general interface, i.e. via: > define SHELL_END_SESSION_DIALOG_PATH > "/org/gnome/SessionManager/EndSessionDialog" > define SHELL_END_SESSION_DIALOG_INTERFACE > "org.gnome.SessionManager.EndSessionDialog" [...]
I'm convinced that if the current implementation in gnome-session is improved to be more general and a second implementation of the interface actually appears, that upstream would be happy to consider a patch for it. Right now there's not much point from their side to spend time on improving for a future theoretical scenario. (Specially since no matter how much preparatory work they do, peoples first step always seems to be to fork rather then contribute.) Regards, Andreas Henriksson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
