Hi Eric,
Eric Engstrom wrote:
> n 7/11/14, 7:16 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > Eric Engstrom wrote:
> >> I should have noted that the patch will only work on jessie or newer, or
> >> at least with a version of LVM that includes the --yes option, which
> >> wheezy does NOT have - at least not the installation I have handy at the
> >> moment.
> >
> > Which makes the patch way less trivial. No idea at the moment how to
> > fix that so it works with both LVM versions. :-(
> >
> > So for the Debian package for Jessie that would be a workaround, but
> > not for upstream... And since I'm upstream, too, I definitely prefer
> > to solve it independent of the LVM version.
>
> A different patch that should be portable would be to pipe yes into the
> lvcreate, as in:
>
> yes | lvcreate .....
Thanks for that idea!
> Still kinda kludgy - should work, but haven't tried it.
Indeed. Will try it.
> Moreover, I'm changing my opinion on the LVM "feature" of asking to wipe
> a FS signature on a new LV. I can't yet come up with a reason where I
> would like that.
*nod*
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
