Agustin Martin <[email protected]> writes: > I see that you finally went for the emacsen-common dependency as lesser > evil, fine. While I would have preferred avoiding the dependency, I admit > that we could not find something simple and rock solid to deal with > the underlying problems without it. > > One question here, does the dependency really needs to be this tight? I > mean, would emacsen-common (>= 2.0.5) be enough? That is the emacsen-common > version in unstable and would help a lot with use of newer add-on packages > in stable.
Good question -- let me investigate. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
